AMD Radeon R9 370X versus AMD Radeon HD 8970M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon HD 8970M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1030 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 82.4 GTexel / s versus 72 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,637 gflops versus 2,304 gflops
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 4800 MHz
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 versus 20588
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 versus 57.241
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 268.643
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 2521
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 2595
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 2521
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 2595
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 versus 14 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s versus 72 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops versus 2,304 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 4800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 versus 20588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 versus 57.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 268.643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 2521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 2595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 2521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 2595 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8970M
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1223.742 versus 1139.703
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.78 versus 5.39
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.306 versus 88.44
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1223.742 versus 1139.703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.78 versus 5.39 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.306 versus 88.44 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 | 20588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 57.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 1223.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 5.78 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 89.306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 268.643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 2521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 2595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 2521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 2595 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3876 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD Radeon HD 8970M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Trinidad | Neptune |
| Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 | 14 May 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 552 | 555 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s | 72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 2,800 million |
| Unités de Compute | 20 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 370X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560X
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
