AMD Radeon R9 370X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 195 Watt
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 versus 18377
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 versus 46.086
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 versus 989.685
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 versus 4.645
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 versus 36.463
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 99.577
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 3306
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 3306
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 195 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 versus 18377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 versus 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 versus 989.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 versus 4.645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 versus 36.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 99.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3306 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1006 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1058 MHz versus 1030 MHz
- Environ 56% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 128.8 billion / sec versus 82.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1280
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,090.4 gflops versus 2,637 gflops
- Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5600 MHz
| Vitesse du noyau | 1006 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1058 MHz versus 1030 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec versus 82.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops versus 2,637 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5600 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 | 18377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 989.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 4.645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 36.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 99.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3306 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Trinidad | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 | 22 March 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 547 | 549 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $579.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 1006 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops | 3,090.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s | 128.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 195 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 10.0" (25.4 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2048 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 370X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
