AMD Radeon R9 370X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 195 Watt
• Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 vs 18377
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 vs 46.086
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 vs 989.685
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 4.645
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 36.463
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 99.577
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 7222
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 3666
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3306
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 7222
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 3666
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1006 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1030 MHz
• Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 128.8 billion / sec vs 82.4 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 3,090.4 gflops vs 2,637 gflops
• Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5600 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	25659 18377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.071 46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1139.703 989.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.39 4.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	88.44 36.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	337.583 99.577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8393 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3704 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8393 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3704 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3306

Compare specifications (specs)