AMD Radeon R9 M295X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M295X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 versus 590
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 26840 versus 23233
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.777 versus 57.735
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.142 versus 5.505
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 68.754 versus 37.407
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 386.418 versus 174.323
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 November 2014 versus 23 May 2013 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 versus 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26840 versus 23233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 versus 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 versus 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 versus 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 versus 174.323 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 863 MHz versus 723 MHz
- Environ 73% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 160.5 billion / sec versus 92.54 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 2048
- Environ 40% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,156 gflops versus 2,961 gflops
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 versus 5150
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 versus 820.138
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2045
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3144
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2045
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3144
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 863 MHz versus 723 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 160.5 billion / sec versus 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops versus 2,961 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7986 versus 5150 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 versus 820.138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3144 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3144 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 | 7986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 | 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26840 | 23233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 | 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 820.138 | 1269.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 | 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 | 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 | 174.323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2045 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3144 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2045 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3144 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M295X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Amethyst | GK110 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 23 November 2014 | 23 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 496 | 451 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Prix maintenant | $740.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 723 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,961 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.54 GTexel / s | 160.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2304 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | Not Listed | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Genre de mémoire | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M295X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
ATIRadeon X700 SE
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 SE
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo
