AMD Radeon R9 M360 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 29.6 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 37% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 947.2 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1818 versus 830
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 versus 253
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8169 versus 2902
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.479 versus 10.872
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 versus 166.832
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 versus 0.817
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 versus 12.415
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 versus 36.916
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 versus 1951
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3324
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 versus 1951
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3324
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 18 June 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1818 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8169 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.479 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3324 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Environ 42% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 versus 1623
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 versus 1623
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 versus 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 versus 1623 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1818 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8169 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.479 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1623 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1623 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Tropo | GF108 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 18 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 985 | 1311 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 8 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 40.1 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore |