AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 924 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 81 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 versus 383
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.656 versus 4.157
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 39.101
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 versus 81.909
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 7 October 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 924 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 81 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 versus 383 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 versus 4.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 39.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 versus 81.909 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 83.04 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 896
- 1207.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,657 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5710 versus 4102
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19029 versus 17594
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 59.428 versus 55
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1113.788 versus 970.421
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 versus 6821
- 74.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 versus 115.4
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2286 versus 1730
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 83.04 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,657 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5710 versus 4102 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19029 versus 17594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 versus 55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 versus 970.421 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 versus 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 versus 115.4 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 versus 1730 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4102 | 5710 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 383 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17594 | 19029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 59.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 1113.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 4.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 39.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 81.909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | 8546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | 8546 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | 2286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GM204 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 7 October 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | $2,560.89 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 561 | 562 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | $1,899 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.86 | 3.99 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 924 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 2,657 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1280 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.2 GTexel / s | 83.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 81 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 170 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 120 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
