AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus AMD FirePro W9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and AMD FirePro W9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1130 MHz versus 930 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 224.6 GTexel/s versus 163.7 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 750 Watt
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13622 versus 7580
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 versus 747
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 64794 versus 43046
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 versus 106.585
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 versus 1878.403
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 versus 9.751
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 versus 82.208
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 versus 511.115
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13621 versus 9143
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13621 versus 9143
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 26 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz versus 930 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s versus 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 750 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13622 versus 7580 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 versus 747 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64794 versus 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 versus 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 versus 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 versus 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 versus 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 versus 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 versus 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 versus 9143 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9100
- Environ 22% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 2304
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 6 GB
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 versus 3719
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 versus 3358
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 versus 3719
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 versus 3358
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2816 versus 2304 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 6 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13622 | 7580 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 747 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64794 | 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 32085 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | Hawaii |
| Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 26 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 205 | 203 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 6,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,238 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 275 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 512 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDFirePro W9100
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon 780M
