AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and AMD Radeon R9 M390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1130 MHz versus 723 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 224.6 GTexel/s versus 92.54 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13685 versus 3597
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 880 versus 435
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 64864 versus 22044
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 versus 64.199
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 versus 1284.053
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 versus 5.881
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 versus 78.169
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 versus 312.822
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13621 versus 6508
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13621 versus 6508
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 5 May 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz versus 723 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s versus 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 2048 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13685 versus 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 versus 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64864 versus 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 versus 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 versus 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 versus 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 versus 78.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 versus 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 versus 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 versus 6508 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 versus 3719
- 7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 versus 3358
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 versus 3719
- 7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13685 | 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 | 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64864 | 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 78.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 24690 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7709 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | Amethyst |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 192 | 303 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 723 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 5,000 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2,961 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore |