AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 215 Watt
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1130 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 28% de pipelines plus haut: 2944 versus 2304
- 9.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18816 versus 13685
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 versus 880
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 versus 64858
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 versus 207.909
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3938.377 versus 3560.776
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 versus 20.486
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 versus 148.938
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 versus 1111.648
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 13621
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3719
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3358
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 13621
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3719
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3358
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10966 versus 7709
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1130 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 2944 versus 2304 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18816 versus 13685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 versus 880 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 versus 64858 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 versus 207.909 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 versus 3560.776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 versus 20.486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 versus 148.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 versus 1111.648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10966 versus 7709 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13685 | 18816 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64858 | 102535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7709 | 10966 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 193 | 97 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |