AMD Radeon RX 580 versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 1188 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1243 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 179.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8878 versus 7885
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42148 versus 38420
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 597.677
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 10320
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 3575
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 10320
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 3575
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 10 November 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 1188 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1243 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 179.0 GTexel / s |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8878 versus 7885 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42148 versus 38420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 115.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 597.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- 923.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,728 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 42% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 versus 771
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 versus 1022.932
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.152 versus 9.235
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 105.263 versus 84.034
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 5,728 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 versus 771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 versus 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 versus 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 versus 84.034 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8878 | 7885 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 771 | 812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42148 | 38420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 115.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 1987.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 10.152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 105.263 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 597.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4360 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 10 November 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $799 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 331 | 309 |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $539.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | 19.25 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 5,728 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 179.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 130 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 224.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
HDMI 2.0 |