AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1395 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1695 MHz
- Environ 29% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 556.0 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 300 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 64% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 209.424
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 2441.384
- 4.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 21090 versus 5118
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1395 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1695 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 versus 26668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 209.424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 2441.384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3713 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 versus 5118 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 10496 versus 5120
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 24 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 versus 1052
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 versus 166557
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 versus 543.753
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 versus 51.155
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 17213
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 17213
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 10496 versus 5120 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 16 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 versus 1052 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 versus 166557 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 versus 543.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 versus 51.155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 | 26668 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 | 1060 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 | 191142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 690.619 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 7585.258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 62.614 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 209.424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 2441.384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 | 5118 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Nom de code | Navi 21 | GA102 |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $1499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 62 | 46 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 80 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 10496 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | |
| Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | Triple-slot |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAA10G
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7600
