AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT versus NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1304 MHz
- Environ 56% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1442 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 3584
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1430 MHz
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26851 versus 16374
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1047 versus 847
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 161031 versus 84757
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 versus 355.937
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 versus 25.191
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 144.928
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 1056.078
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 versus 16640
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 versus 16640
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 1 October 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1304 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1442 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 3584 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 16 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1430 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26851 versus 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 versus 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 161031 versus 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 versus 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 versus 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 versus 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 versus 16640 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 235 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 versus 3714
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 versus 3350
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 versus 3714
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 versus 3350
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26851 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 161031 | 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20908 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 21 | GP100 |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 70 | 87 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 80 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 235 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 15,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 10,329 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | |
Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1430 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |