AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 versus AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and AMD Radeon RX 550 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1240 MHz versus 1183 MHz
- Environ 45% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 55 GTexel / s versus 37.86 GTexel / s
- Environ 38% de pipelines plus haut: 704 versus 512
- 1466.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,760 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 versus 476
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 versus 11610
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 versus 33.507
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 versus 3.064
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 versus 52.533
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 versus 140.911
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 versus 940
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3107 versus 2158
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 versus 940
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3107 versus 2158
- 9.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 versus 127
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1240 MHz versus 1183 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55 GTexel / s versus 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 704 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,760 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 versus 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 versus 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 versus 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 versus 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 versus 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 versus 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 versus 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 versus 127 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- 3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 2106
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 364.578
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 3455
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 3455
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 2106 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 364.578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 3455 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 | 2690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 | 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | 1037.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 | 127 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Raven | Lexa |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 795 | 876 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Prix maintenant | $75 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1240 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,760 gflops | 1.2 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55 GTexel / s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 2,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |