NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon RX Vega pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14695 versus 12297
- 7.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 versus 2094
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3638 versus 2391
- 7.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 versus 2094
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3638 versus 2391
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 November 2017 versus 1 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14695 versus 12297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 versus 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 versus 2391 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 307.2 GTexel / s versus 255.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 68% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2432
- Environ 20% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 9,830 gflops versus 8,186 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 versus 876
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 versus 55390
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.048 versus 182.11
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3986.188 versus 1797.792
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.999 versus 14.071
- 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.468 versus 26.444
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1291.445 versus 1035.984
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 versus 3344
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 versus 3344
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 307.2 GTexel / s versus 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 2432 |
Performance á point flottant | 9,830 gflops versus 8,186 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 versus 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68096 versus 55390 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.048 versus 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3986.188 versus 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.999 versus 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.468 versus 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 versus 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 versus 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 versus 3344 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14695 | 12297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 | 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55390 | 68096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | 205.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | 3986.188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | 17.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | 215.468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | 1291.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 8455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.3 |
Nom de code | GP104 | Greenland |
Date de sortie | 2 November 2017 | 1 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $599.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 245 | 242 |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | $409.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | 38.94 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | 9,830 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2432 | 4096 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 255.8 GTexel / s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256.3 GB / s | 512 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |