Intel HD Graphics 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 192 versus 89
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 versus 4.329
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.426
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 versus 737
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 versus 737
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 May 2012 versus 3 September 2010 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 versus 89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 versus 4.329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 versus 0.426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 versus 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 versus 737 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Environ 54% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 43% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 6.0 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 16
- 5.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 192 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- Environ 96% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 397 versus 346
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1583 versus 538
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.162 versus 155.638
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.306 versus 12.009
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 versus 1492
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 versus 2392
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 versus 1492
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 versus 2392
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.0 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 versus 16 |
Performance á point flottant | 192 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 397 versus 346 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1583 versus 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.162 versus 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.306 versus 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 versus 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 versus 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 versus 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 versus 2392 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 346 | 397 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 | 89 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | 1583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | 4.329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | 162.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | 0.426 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | 12.306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 2906 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 2906 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Ivy Bridge GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 14 May 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1506 | 1509 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 33.6 gflops | 192 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.2 GTexel / s | 6.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 23 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,200 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
RAM maximale | 512 MB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | (G)DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
CUDA |