Intel HD Graphics 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4000

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 versus 152
Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 versus 5.055
Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.635

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	14 May 2012 versus 22 March 2012
Processus de fabrication	22 nm versus 40 nm
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	194 versus 152
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.712 versus 5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931 versus 0.635

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

6x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 16
7.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 45 Watt
Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 versus 347
4.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2387 versus 538
Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 versus 155.638
Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.393 versus 7.36
Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.903 versus 12.009
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 967 versus 754
Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 versus 1492
Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 2392
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 967 versus 754
Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 versus 1492
Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 2392

Caractéristiques
Pipelines	96 versus 16
Performance á point flottant	253.4 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt versus 45 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	532 versus 347
Geekbench - OpenCL	2387 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	215.004 versus 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.393 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	19.903 versus 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	967 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2766 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 versus 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	967 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2766 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 versus 2392

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

347

532

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

194

152

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

538

2387

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.712

5.055

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

155.638

215.004

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.931

0.635

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.36

10.393

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.009

19.903

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

967

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

2766

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

967

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

2766

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

3359

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
PassMark - G3D Mark	347	532
PassMark - G2D Mark	194	152
Geekbench - OpenCL	538	2387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.712	5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.638	215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931	0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.36	10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.009	19.903
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	754	967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492	2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	754	967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492	2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 7.0	Fermi
Nom de code	Ivy Bridge GT2	GF108
Date de sortie	14 May 2012	22 March 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1501	1390
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	650 MHz
Performance á point flottant	33.6 gflops	253.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	16	96
Taux de remplissage de la texture	4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	33 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,200 million	585 million
Noyaux CUDA		96
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 2.0
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	11.1 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.0	4.5
DirectX 11.2		12 API
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit
Mémoire partagé	1	0
RAM maximale		1 GB
Vitesse de mémoire		1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire		DDR3\GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus