Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus AMD Radeon HD 6950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and AMD Radeon HD 6950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- 11.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 500 Watt
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 14 December 2010 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 500 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6950
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 70.4 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 70.4x plus de pipelines: 1408 versus 20
- 45.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,252.8 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 4.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2602 versus 630
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 versus 314
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6105 versus 3210
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.999 versus 8.844
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 899.056 versus 171.17
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.659 versus 1.115
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.698 versus 10.385
- 20.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.203 versus 12.361
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3652 versus 988
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2523 versus 1702
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 versus 2808
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3652 versus 988
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2523 versus 1702
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 versus 2808
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 70.4 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,252.8 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2602 versus 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 versus 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6105 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.999 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 899.056 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.659 versus 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.698 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3652 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2523 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3652 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2523 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 versus 2808 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 2602 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 445 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 6105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 16.999 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 899.056 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 1.659 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 49.698 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 251.203 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 2523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 11657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 2523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 11657 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon HD 6950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 3 |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | Cayman |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 14 December 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 686 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 2,252.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 1408 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 70.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 2,640 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
