Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus Intel HD Graphics 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 300 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 30 Watt
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1043 versus 587
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 versus 224
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 versus 3139
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 9.563
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 versus 713
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 versus 1713
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 versus 713
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 versus 1713
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 27 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 30 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1043 versus 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 versus 224 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 versus 3139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 9.563 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 versus 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 versus 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 versus 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 versus 1713 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5000
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 40 versus 24
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 versus 273.504
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1103 versus 878
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1103 versus 878
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 40 versus 24 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 versus 273.504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1103 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1103 versus 878 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1043 | 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 224 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 3139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 9.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 490.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 1713 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 366 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Haswell GT3 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 27 May 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1378 | 1381 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 40 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |