Intel HD Graphics 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 versus 478
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 versus 91
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 versus 2171
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 4.85
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 versus 0.561
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 versus 9.109
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 versus 16.727
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 versus 2701
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 versus 2701
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 5 January 2011 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 versus 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 versus 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 versus 2171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 versus 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 versus 9.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 versus 16.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 2701 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 672 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 24
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 versus 143.083
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 960 versus 951
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 versus 1462
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 960 versus 951
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 versus 1462
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 versus 24 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.796 versus 143.083 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 960 versus 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2210 versus 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 960 versus 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2210 versus 1462 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 2171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 195.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 9.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 16.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 2701 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 5 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 1503 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 672 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 258.05 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.8 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |