Intel HD Graphics 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 19 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 versus 623
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 versus 1946
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 6.705
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.083 versus 100.391
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 versus 0.441
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 versus 8.146
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 versus 20.64
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 versus 1833
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 versus 1833
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 versus 192
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 27 March 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 19 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 versus 623 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 versus 1946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 versus 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 versus 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 versus 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 versus 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 1833 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 versus 192 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 3.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 versus 209
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 versus 951
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 versus 1462
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 versus 951
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 1462
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 versus 209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 1462 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 623 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 212 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 1946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 1833 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GK208B |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 27 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 1488 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 520 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
