Intel HD Graphics 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 9.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 148 Watt
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 4 GB
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 19 September 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 148 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 4 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- 69.3x plus de pipelines: 1664 versus 24
- 11.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 versus 864
- 3.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 209
- 7.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 versus 3993
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 versus 21.852
- 8.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 versus 143.083
- 7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 versus 1.243
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 versus 12.958
- 17.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 versus 28.182
- 12.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 951
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 1462
- 12.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 951
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 1462
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 369 versus 326
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1664 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 versus 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 versus 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 versus 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 versus 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 versus 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 versus 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 versus 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 versus 326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 369 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GM204 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 19 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 371 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Prix maintenant | $407.76 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1664 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pins | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 520 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
