Intel HD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 5.3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 6 GB
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 19 July 2016 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 6 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- 5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 63% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s
- 53.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 24
- 10.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- 10.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10077 versus 927
- 3.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 versus 218
- 8.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35375 versus 4185
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 versus 24.275
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 versus 227.879
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 versus 1.508
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.766 versus 15.582
- 15x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 versus 30.288
- 8.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 1404
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 versus 1733
- 8.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 1404
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 versus 1733
- 12.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4208 versus 343
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10077 versus 927 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 versus 218 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35375 versus 4185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 versus 24.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 versus 227.879 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 versus 1.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.766 versus 15.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 versus 30.288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 1733 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4208 versus 343 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 927 | 10077 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 749 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4185 | 35375 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | 119.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | 1373.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | 8.694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | 21.766 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | 454.799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 12442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 12442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 | 4208 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GP106 |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 19 July 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1334 | 345 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1709 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 250 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 6 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800 GTS 512
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7500G
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570D
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8450G
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile
