Intel HD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 27.6 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 7.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 106 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 versus 14.758
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 versus 302.509
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 versus 0.965
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 versus 14.925
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 versus 27.656
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 3325
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 3325
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 13 September 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 106 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 versus 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 versus 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 versus 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 versus 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 versus 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 4.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1566 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 601.3 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 versus 1114
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 versus 268
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 versus 4554
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 versus 1859
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 versus 1945
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 versus 1859
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 versus 1945
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 601.3 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 versus 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 versus 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 versus 4554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 versus 1945 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 1322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 310 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 4907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF106 |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 13 September 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 1130 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1566 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 57.7 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 Ultra
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 TX
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
