Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 106 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 14.758
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 vs 302.509
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 0.965
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 vs 14.925
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 vs 27.656
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3325
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

• 4.5x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
• Around 36% better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 vs 1114
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 vs 268
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 vs 4554
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 1859
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 1945
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 1859
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 1322
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 310
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 4907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 14.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 302.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 0.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 14.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 27.656
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3325

Compare specifications (specs)