Intel HD Graphics P4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics P4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Environ 57% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 45% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 84 Watt versus 122 Watt
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 versus 418
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 versus 418 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 6.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3846 versus 605
- 3.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12520 versus 3386
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 8.915
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 versus 146.479
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 1.178
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.832 versus 10.689
- 11.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 versus 6.64
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 versus 3342
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 versus 3342
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3846 versus 605 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12520 versus 3386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 versus 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 versus 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 versus 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3345 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 3846 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 | 418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3386 | 12520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.479 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 June 2013 | 11 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 685 | 762 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics P4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
IntelHD Graphics 2000
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDFirePro S9000
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
