NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 944 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 68% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 84 Watt
- 6.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3775 versus 605
- 4.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14739 versus 3385
- 7.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.59 versus 8.915
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 720.592 versus 146.479
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.903 versus 1.178
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.947 versus 10.689
- 33.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.296 versus 6.64
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 9 January 2015 versus 1 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 944 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 84 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3775 versus 605 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14739 versus 3385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 versus 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 720.592 versus 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.903 versus 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 versus 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 versus 6.64 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 950 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 versus 340
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 versus 2566
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 versus 2566
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 950 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 versus 340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 versus 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 versus 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 versus 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 versus 3337 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3775 | 605 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 963 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14739 | 3385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 | 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 720.592 | 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.903 | 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 | 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 | 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5783 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2566 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5783 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2566 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3345 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1831 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | GM204 | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 9 January 2015 | 1 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 703 | 685 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 944 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,355 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 73.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M vs
ATIRadeon X1050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8950 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
