Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 21.3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 versus 1947
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 versus 326
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8759 versus 5980
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 versus 20.831
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 1 October 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 3 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 versus 1947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 versus 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 versus 5980 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 versus 20.831 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 600 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 13.3x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 72
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3396 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 1668
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3396 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 1668
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 960 versus 72 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3396 versus 2846 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3396 versus 2846 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 1947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 | 5980 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 | 20.831 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Skylake GT4e | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 1 October 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 993 | 818 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 960 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,154 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48.0 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | 3 GB |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 67.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |