Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 21.3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 versus 340
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8759 versus 8599
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 versus 29.528
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 versus 2.486
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3331
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3331
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 versus 340 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 versus 8599 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 versus 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 versus 2.486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3331 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 811 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 13.3x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 72
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2796 versus 1978
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 731.755 versus 450.087
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.15 versus 25.346
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.659 versus 67.077
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 versus 1668
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 versus 1668
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 811 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 72 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2796 versus 1978 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 versus 450.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 versus 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 versus 67.077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 versus 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 2796 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 340 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 | 8599 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | 87.659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT4e | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 993 | 843 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $177.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 811 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 960 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 3 GB |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 avec des autres
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDFirePro M5950
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
IntelArc A350M
