Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 80 Watt
- 21.3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8759 versus 6660
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 versus 18.437
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 versus 427.88
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 versus 1.897
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.346 versus 23.742
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.077 versus 61.965
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3321
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3321
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 1 March 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 80 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 versus 6660 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 versus 18.437 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 versus 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 versus 1.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 versus 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 versus 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 10.7x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 72
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2724 versus 1978
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 417 versus 361
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 versus 1668
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 versus 1668
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 72 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2724 versus 1978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 versus 361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 versus 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 2724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 417 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 | 6660 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | 18.437 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | 1.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3321 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT4e | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 1 March 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 993 | 889 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
| Prix maintenant | $225.65 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,244 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 3 GB |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 134.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5616 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 avec des autres
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDFirePro M5950
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
IntelArc A350M
