Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 78.4 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 9.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 140 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 versus 11364
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 30.505
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 versus 705.293
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 versus 3.085
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 35.416
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 versus 62.69
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 3581
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 3581
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 78.4 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 140 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 versus 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 versus 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 versus 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 versus 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 versus 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 384
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 2666
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 383
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 2666 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 6 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 740 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
