Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 9 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 89.26 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12007 versus 11872
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.73 versus 24.986
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.292 versus 826.477
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.585 versus 2.362
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.701 versus 35.269
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.595 versus 55.394
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3657
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3657
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 89.26 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12007 versus 11872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 versus 24.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 versus 826.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.585 versus 2.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.701 versus 35.269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.595 versus 55.394 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 384
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3635 versus 2682
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 554 versus 367
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6030 versus 5609
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6030 versus 5609
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3635 versus 2682 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 554 versus 367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6030 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6030 versus 5609 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2682 | 3635 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 554 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12007 | 11872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 | 24.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 | 826.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.585 | 2.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.701 | 35.269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.595 | 55.394 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 6030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 6030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3347 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 631 | 628 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 89.26 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,142 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIFireGL V5600
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550X
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon R9 A375
