Intel UHD Graphics 617 versus Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 617 and Intel HD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 617
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 25.20 GTexel/s versus 27.6 GTexel / s
Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 versus 30 August 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.20 GTexel/s versus 27.6 GTexel / s |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4565 versus 3293
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 versus 1313
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 versus 1313
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 versus 1461
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 versus 1461
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 1633
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 1633
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 versus 231
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 versus 870
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4565 versus 3293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 versus 1313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 versus 1313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 versus 1461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 versus 1461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 1633 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 versus 231 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 versus 870 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3293 | 4565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | 3344 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 231 | 268 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 870 | 1114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Amber Lake GT2 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 | 30 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1230 | 1231 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.20 GTexel/s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
RAM maximale | 64 GB | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 |