NVIDIA GeForce 800M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 457 versus 437
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 versus 126
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.91 versus 4.233
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.249 versus 7.151
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 March 2014 versus 23 August 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 versus 437 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 versus 126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 versus 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 versus 7.151 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- 2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
- Environ 79% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 141.7 gflops
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2108 versus 1303
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.144 versus 109.13
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.605 versus 15.218
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 versus 703
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 versus 1123
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 1601
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 versus 703
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 versus 1123
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 1601
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 141.7 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2108 versus 1303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 versus 109.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 versus 15.218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 versus 703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 versus 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 1601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 versus 703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 versus 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 1601 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | 437 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 126 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | 2108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | 161.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | 7.151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | 16.605 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | 2392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF117 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 17 March 2014 | 23 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1503 | 1505 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 738 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 141.7 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.904 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 715 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 800M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 420
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
IntelHD Graphics 4000
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
IntelHD Graphics 510
