NVIDIA GeForce 840M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 840M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 902 MHz
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Environ 97% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 12% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2002 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5771 versus 3771
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.848 versus 11.448
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.237 versus 0.792
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 versus 14.637
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 versus 20.86
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 versus 2375
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 versus 2375
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 5 June 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 902 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5771 versus 3771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 versus 11.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 versus 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 versus 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 versus 20.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 versus 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 versus 2375 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Environ 61% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.86 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1170 versus 1096
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 versus 151
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.777 versus 162.594
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 versus 2085
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 versus 3191
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 versus 2085
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 versus 3191
- 3.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1565 versus 503
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.86 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1170 versus 1096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 versus 151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 versus 162.594 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 versus 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 versus 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 versus 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 versus 3191 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 versus 503 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 | 1170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 295 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5771 | 3771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 | 11.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 | 206.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 | 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 | 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 | 20.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 | 1565 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 840M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 5 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1235 | 1158 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 902 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | 28.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |