NVIDIA GeForce 920M versus AMD Radeon R5 M240
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 920M and AMD Radeon R5 M240 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 versus 458
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 versus 881
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 versus 1444
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3249
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 versus 881
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 versus 1444
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3249
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 18 September 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 versus 458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 versus 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 versus 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3249 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 versus 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 versus 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3249 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M240
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 954 MHz
- Environ 66% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 20.6 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 659.2 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 versus 119
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6975 versus 3722
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 954 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.6 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 659.2 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 versus 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6975 versus 3722 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M240
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | AMD Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 | 458 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 150 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3722 | 6975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3249 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3249 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 920M | AMD Radeon R5 M240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK208B | Jet |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 18 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1297 | 1298 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | Not Listed |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | Not Listed |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
