NVIDIA GeForce 920M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 775 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 297.6 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 versus 450
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3722 versus 2612
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.358 versus 6.901
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 157.606 versus 146.913
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.843 versus 0.587
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.374 versus 10.121
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 versus 22.755
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 versus 1047
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 versus 2570
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2035
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 versus 1047
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 versus 2570
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2035
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 versus 450 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3722 versus 2612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 versus 6.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 versus 146.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 versus 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 versus 10.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 versus 22.755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 versus 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 versus 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 versus 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 versus 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2035 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 | 450 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3722 | 2612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | 6.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | 146.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | 10.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | 22.755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2035 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK208B | GF117 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1297 | 1438 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 938 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 920M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
ATIRadeon 9000
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M445
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M435
