NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce 920M und NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 23% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:954 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 4x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 96
- Etwa 24% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 297.6 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 13% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 vs 450
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3722 vs 2612
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.358 vs 6.901
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 157.606 vs 146.913
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.843 vs 0.587
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.374 vs 10.121
- Etwa 78% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 22.755
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 1047
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 2570
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2035
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 1047
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 2570
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2035
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 March 2015 vs 1 April 2013 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 96 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 297.6 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 vs 450 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3722 vs 2612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 vs 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 vs 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 vs 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 vs 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 vs 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 vs 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 vs 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2035 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 | 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3722 | 2612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2035 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Codename | GK208B | GF117 |
Startdatum | 13 March 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1297 | 1438 |
Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz | 775 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 297.6 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 96 |
Texturfüllrate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 585 million | 585 million |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 938 MHz | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1-Kanal HD-Audio auf HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | Up to 2560x1600 | |
eDP 1.2 Signalunterstützung | Up to 2560x1600 | |
HDCP-Inhaltsschutz | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung von LVDS-Signalen | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD und DTS-HD Audio Bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Standard-Speicherkonfiguration | DDR3 | |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder |