NVIDIA GeForce 945M versus AMD FirePro W4100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 945M and AMD FirePro W4100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 630 MHz
- Environ 48% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.81 GTexel / s versus 20.16 GTexel / s
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 953.9 gflops versus 645.1 gflops
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2109 versus 1514
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8099 versus 5489
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 versus 15.65
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.988 versus 1.631
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.094 versus 75.309
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 versus 1951
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3399
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 1620
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 versus 1951
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3399
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 1620
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 versus 13 August 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 630 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s versus 20.16 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops versus 645.1 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 versus 1514 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 versus 5489 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 versus 15.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 versus 1.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 versus 75.309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 1620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 1620 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W4100
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 versus 240
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 versus 380.461
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 versus 31.027
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 versus 240 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 versus 380.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 versus 31.027 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | 1514 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 455 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | 5489 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | 15.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | 538.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | 1.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | 31.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | 75.309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 1620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 1620 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD FirePro W4100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 | 13 August 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 972 | 973 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 630 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 645.1 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 20.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Facteur de forme | Low Profile / Half Length | |
| Longeur | 171 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 945M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
ATIFireGL T2-128
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1100
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGRID K2
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDFirePro W4100
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient
