NVIDIA GeForce 945M versus AMD FirePro W4100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 945M and AMD FirePro W4100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 630 MHz
- Environ 48% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.81 GTexel / s versus 20.16 GTexel / s
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 953.9 gflops versus 645.1 gflops
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2109 versus 1529
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8099 versus 5516
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 versus 15.65
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.988 versus 1.63
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.094 versus 75.309
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 versus 1951
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3399
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 1620
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 versus 1951
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3399
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 1620
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 versus 13 August 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 630 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s versus 20.16 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops versus 645.1 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 versus 1529 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 versus 5516 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 versus 15.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 versus 1.63 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 versus 75.309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 1620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 1620 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W4100
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 481 versus 240
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 versus 380.461
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 versus 31.027
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 versus 240 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 versus 380.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 versus 31.027 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | 1529 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 481 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | 5516 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | 15.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | 538.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | 1.63 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | 31.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | 75.309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 1620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 1620 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD FirePro W4100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 | 13 August 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 961 | 953 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 630 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 645.1 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 20.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Facteur de forme | Low Profile / Half Length | |
| Longeur | 171 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 945M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon 680M
