NVIDIA GeForce 945M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 945M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 versus 225
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 versus 22.828
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 380.461 versus 210.585
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.027 versus 28.662
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 versus 10 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 915 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 versus 225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 versus 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 versus 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 versus 28.662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Environ 46% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.4 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- Environ 46% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 953.9 gflops
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3028 versus 2108
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10102 versus 8099
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.416 versus 1.988
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 versus 107.094
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 versus 2961
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 versus 2961
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 953.9 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3028 versus 2108 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10102 versus 8099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.416 versus 1.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 versus 107.094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 versus 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 versus 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3683 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 | 3028 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | 10102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | 3.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 945M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 | 10 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 952 | 898 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 or 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 945M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840A
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDFirePro W4100
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 2
