NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M versus AMD FirePro M8900
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M and AMD FirePro M8900 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2011 versus 12 April 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M8900
- 6.7x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 144
- 3.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,305.6 gflops versus 388.8 gflops
- 6.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18738 versus 2833
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.529 versus 7.438
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 760.858 versus 252.895
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.158 versus 0.717
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.149 versus 12.581
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.525 versus 21.909
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 144 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,305.6 gflops versus 388.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18738 versus 2833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.529 versus 7.438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 760.858 versus 252.895 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.158 versus 0.717 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.149 versus 12.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.525 versus 21.909 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M8900
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | AMD FirePro M8900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 658 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2833 | 18738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.438 | 10.529 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 | 760.858 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.717 | 1.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 | 26.149 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 | 108.525 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | AMD FirePro M8900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF106 | Blackcomb |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2011 | 12 April 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1414 | 1416 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 388.8 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 144 | 960 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 1,700 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 680 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | n / a |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Facteur de forme | MXM-B | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 115 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 435M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M vs
AMDFirePro M8900
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7560D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M vs
IntelHD Graphics 4400
