NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

  • 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 32 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt versus 32 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

  • 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
  • 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 544.5 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
  • Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 935 versus 479
  • Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 160 versus 141
  • Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2673 versus 2229
  • Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 versus 999
  • Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 versus 999
  • Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 versus 2333
  • Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 versus 2333
  • Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 versus 3257
  • Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 versus 3257
Caractéristiques
Pipelines 384 versus 96
Performance á point flottant 544.5 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 935 versus 479
PassMark - G2D Mark 160 versus 141
Geekbench - OpenCL 2673 versus 2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1913 versus 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1913 versus 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3670 versus 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3670 versus 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3341 versus 3257
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3341 versus 3257

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
479
935
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
141
160
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2229
2673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
999
1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
999
1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2333
3670
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2333
3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3257
3341
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3257
3341
Nom NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
PassMark - G3D Mark 479 935
PassMark - G2D Mark 141 160
Geekbench - OpenCL 2229 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 999 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 999 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2333 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2333 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3257 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3257 3341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 285.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.116

Comparer les caractéristiques

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Essentiel

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Kepler
Nom de code GF117 GK107
Date de sortie 1 October 2012 1 October 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1213 1214
Genre Laptop Laptop

Infos techniques

Noyaux CUDA 96 384
Performance á point flottant 240.0 gflops 544.5 gflops
Processus de fabrication 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 96 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 32 Watt
Compte de transistor 585 million 1,270 million
Taux de remplissage de la texture 22.7 billion / sec

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale Up to 2048x1536 Up to 2048x1536

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Soutien de bus PCI Express 2.0 PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop medium sized medium sized

Soutien API

DirectX 12 API 12 API
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Mémoire

RAM maximale 2 GB 2 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire 64 Bit 128bit
Vitesse de mémoire 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire DDR3 DDR3\GDDR5
Mémoire partagé 0 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
3D Vision