NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 99% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.75 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 9.6x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 20
- 6.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 306.0 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.317 versus 12.361
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 September 2014 versus 3 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.75 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 306.0 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 versus 630 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 versus 12.361 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 208
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 2224
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 4.418
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 142.734
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.395
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 versus 8.158
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 versus 895
- 6.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 280
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 519
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 versus 895
- 6.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 280
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 519
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 208 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 versus 2224 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 versus 4.418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 142.734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 versus 8.158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 versus 895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 versus 280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 versus 895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 versus 280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 519 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 | 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2224 | 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | GK208B | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 29 September 2014 | 3 June 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $49 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1590 | 1359 |
| Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 306.0 gflops | 50 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 20 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.75 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB or 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6600 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8180
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720 vs
AMDRadeon R5 220 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720 vs
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics
