NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M versus NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and NVIDIA NVS 510 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 44% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 441.6 gflops versus 306.0 gflops
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 versus 1699
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 versus 6.809
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 151.304 versus 111.269
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 versus 0.399
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 versus 7.769
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 versus 9.522
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 versus 1211
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1426 versus 976
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 versus 1720
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 versus 1211
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 versus 976
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 versus 1720
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 23 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops versus 306.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 versus 1699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 versus 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 versus 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 versus 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 versus 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 versus 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 versus 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 versus 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 versus 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 versus 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 versus 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 versus 1720 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 510
- Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 39% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.75 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 versus 653
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 versus 129
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 575 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.75 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 versus 653 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 versus 129 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 653 | 685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 286 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 | 1699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 | 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 | 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 | 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 | 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 | 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 | 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 | 1720 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK208 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 23 October 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1449 | 1450 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $449 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 889 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | 797 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 9.2 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |