NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1152 MHz versus 1127 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1417 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 1001.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19895 versus 18663
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 versus 792.44
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 versus 4.888
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 versus 35.338
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 versus 200.825
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 versus 7218
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3335
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 versus 7218
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3335
- 14.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 versus 157
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 versus 22 January 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz versus 1127 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19895 versus 18663 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 versus 792.44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 versus 4.888 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 versus 35.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 versus 200.825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 versus 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 versus 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 versus 157 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 72 billion / sec versus 68.02 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 768
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,413 gflops versus 2,177 gflops
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6100 versus 5332
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 versus 347
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 versus 54.188
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 versus 3579
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 versus 3579
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 billion / sec versus 68.02 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops versus 2,177 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6100 versus 5332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 versus 347 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 versus 54.188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 3579 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5332 | 6100 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 347 | 673 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19895 | 18663 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | 73.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | 792.44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | 4.888 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | 35.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | 200.825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 | 157 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GM206 |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 | 22 January 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 521 | 524 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz | 1127 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,177 gflops | 2,413 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.02 GTexel / s | 72 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 2,940 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 2x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3500M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Sky 500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
