NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 667 MHz
- 2.1x plus de vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 versus 19220
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 47.147
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 3.996
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 115.307
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 5946
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 5946
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 22 July 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 667 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 771 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 versus 19220 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 47.147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 3.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 115.307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 5946 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- Environ 90% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 148.0 GTexel / s versus 77.76 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 768
- Environ 43% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,553 gflops versus 2,488 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6135 versus 5918
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 553 versus 323
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1278.433 versus 843.503
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 50.08 versus 24.676
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 148.0 GTexel / s versus 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,553 gflops versus 2,488 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6135 versus 5918 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 553 versus 323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1278.433 versus 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.08 versus 24.676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | 6135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 19220 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 47.147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1278.433 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 3.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 50.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 115.307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 533 | 535 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,699.74 | |
| Prix maintenant | $523.66 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 3,553 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 148.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V7300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V3300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
