NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce 920M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 954 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 8.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 8.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 versus 716
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 versus 119
- 5.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 versus 3722
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 8.358
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 157.606
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 0.843
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 versus 15.374
- 7.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 40.443
- 5.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 1598
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 3636
- 5.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 1598
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 3636
- 7.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 versus 326
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 954 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 versus 716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 versus 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 versus 3722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 8.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 157.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 0.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 versus 15.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 40.443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 3636 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 versus 326 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | 716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 3722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 8.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 157.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 0.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 15.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 40.443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 | 326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GK208B |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 533 | 1297 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V7300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V3300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
