NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB versus AMD FirePro S9050
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and AMD FirePro S9050 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 22% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 123.0 GTexel / s versus 100.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 22% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,935 gflops versus 3,226 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 46% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 5500 MHz
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9762 versus 4901
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 versus 369
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 versus 68.324
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 versus 6.491
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 versus 344.551
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 versus 7062
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 versus 7062
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 versus 7 August 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.0 GTexel / s versus 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops versus 3,226 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 5500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9762 versus 4901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 versus 369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 versus 68.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 versus 6.491 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 versus 344.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 versus 7062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 versus 7062 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S9050
- Environ 56% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1152
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1463.376 versus 1325.07
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.133 versus 31.946
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 versus 3697
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 versus 3338
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 versus 3697
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 versus 3338
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1152 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 versus 1325.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 versus 31.946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 versus 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 versus 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 versus 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 versus 3338 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | AMD FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9762 | 4901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | 369 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32308 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | 68.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | 1463.376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | 6.491 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | 91.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | 344.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 7062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 6260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 13032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 7062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 6260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 13032 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3851 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 | 7 August 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 372 | 373 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.0 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 250 mm | 254 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 264 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
AMDFirePro S9050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
