NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB versus NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 89% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 89% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 902 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9762 versus 8068
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 versus 539
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32335 versus 24095
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 versus 67.178
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 versus 7.435
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 versus 355.166
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 797 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 902 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9762 versus 8068 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 versus 539 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32335 versus 24095 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 versus 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 versus 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 versus 355.166 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Environ 76% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 216.5 GTexel / s versus 123.0 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 2880 versus 1152
- Environ 32% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,196 gflops versus 3,935 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 versus 1325.07
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.889 versus 31.946
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 versus 10566
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3338
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 versus 10566
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3338
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 216.5 GTexel / s versus 123.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 versus 1152 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,196 gflops versus 3,935 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 3 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 versus 1325.07 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 versus 31.946 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 versus 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 versus 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 versus 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 versus 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3338 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9762 | 8068 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 | 539 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32335 | 24095 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3851 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Nom de code | GP106 | GK110B |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $5,265 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 372 | 374 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $833.98 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz | 902 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 797 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops | 5,196 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 2880 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.0 GTexel / s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 250 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |