NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB versus NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 75% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 861 MHz
- Environ 65% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 132.9 GTexel / s
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 4,252 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 21% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 6612 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10086 versus 9393
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 versus 661
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35364 versus 29528
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 versus 99.169
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 versus 1183.119
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 versus 7.899
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 19 July 2016 versus 29 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 861 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 132.9 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 4,252 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 6612 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10086 versus 9393 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 versus 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35364 versus 29528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 versus 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 versus 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 versus 7.899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3324 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1280
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.364 versus 21.766
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 498.551 versus 454.799
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12524 versus 12442
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12524 versus 12442
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1280 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.364 versus 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 498.551 versus 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 versus 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 versus 12442 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10086 | 9393 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35364 | 29528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 | 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 | 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 | 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.766 | 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 | 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4211 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP106 | GM204 |
Date de sortie | 19 July 2016 | 29 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | $2,856.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 343 | 345 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $1,498 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.47 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 861 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops | 4,252 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 250 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |