NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1506 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1771 MHz versus 1683 MHz
- Environ 40% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 283.4 GTexel / s versus 202.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1920
- Environ 40% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 9,068 gflops versus 6,463 gflops
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 10 GB/s versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55523 versus 47301
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 1718.593
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 12.283
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 710.366
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 versus 13765
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 versus 3691
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 versus 3340
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 versus 13765
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 versus 3691
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 versus 3340
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7241 versus 6066
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 versus 10 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1506 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz versus 1683 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s versus 202.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1920 |
Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops versus 6,463 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10 GB/s versus 8 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55523 versus 47301 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 versus 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 versus 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 versus 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 versus 6066 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 versus 150.103
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.289 versus 27.417
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 versus 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 versus 27.417 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55523 | 47301 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 | 6066 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13498 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 | 10 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499.99 | $379 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 287 | 284 |
Prix maintenant | $439.99 | $359.99 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.70 | 45.72 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | 1920 |
Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops | 6,463 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | 94 °C |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1920 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | 256 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |